Sherlock Holmes vs Michael Jackson: Mystery or Coincidence in a Resolved Case? (Part 5 of 6)

In the first 3 minuts of the final problem part 3 
 ( here the link http://youtu.be/Y_qDuvJeLcI )
we can notice indeed the connection with Holmes and MJJ. We all know that Michael like make jokes and he 
used disguises and to make up his face to can go out side or for travel freely for not to be recogized by the fans or by the press, enjoying, in this way, of a little more of his life and freedom, and as the press did, the Professor Moriarty was always hidden trying to stalk Michael wherever he was ( Analogy connection )


Holmes and Watson's journey takes them to Switzerland where they stay at Meiringen. From there they fatefully decide to take a walk which will include a visit to Reichenbach Falls, a local natural wonder.


Another analogy than we can notice it is

the pipe that in min 09:27 Holmes is smooking The shape remind me of the elephant's trunk (connection with the elephants symbology and meaning ) 


In December 1893, in order to dedicate more of his time to what he considered his more important works (his historical novels), Conan Doyle had Holmes and Professor Moriarty apparently plunge to their deaths together down the Reichenbach Falls in the story "The Final Problem" But please watch and analize together the part 3 and 4 of this novel before to arrives at conclusions -


The final problem part 4 http://youtu.be/6V9ApSbilwM


"The Final Problem" was intended to be exactly what its name says. Conan Doyle meant to stop writing about his famous detective after this short story; he felt the Sherlock Holmes stories were distracting him from more serious literary efforts and that "killing" Holmes off was the only way of getting his career back on track. "I must save my mind for better things," he wrote to his mother at the time, "even if it means I must bury my pocketbook with him."


In this sentence "I must save my mind for better things" we could find another analogy We know that Michael wished to dedicate his time also to other kind of interests : write, read, films, direction So in this I see the connection btw the choice made by 
Conan Doyle and Michael - Indeed the connection there is Then Michael did faked his dead not only to eliminate his( our) enemies and get justice , not only for enjoy of his life and freedom freely but also to can dedicate his time to make things than for him are really important in this moment and he wish to realize other important works exactly as the autor of the adventurs of Sharlok Holmes -
But Public outcry and the request of numerous fans than loved the adventures of Sharlok Holmes,however,led him to bring the character back-
( as us fans,we wish the BAM'S DAY Michael return)


Conan Doyle will return to write indeed in 1901,in The Hound of the Baskervilles, though this was set at a time before the Reichenbach incident. 
Here a most recent version http://youtu.be/C95sgGdO758
interesting the first immagines of this video
( connection with the autopsy of the "corpse" really similar to the pictures of the body we saw during the trial )
Here instead the classic one http://youtu.be/BKnZ8etir6E


The real Holmes return is here 
http://youtu.be/SOgWPNQJDho 


*Elementary, my dear Watson* 


There are more clues and connections. The mirrors are upside down and in a weird angle. He thinks he killed Holmes but instead he shoots to a mannequin and when Holmes, returning, was able to catch and delivered to the police the other dangerous enemy. 

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"

The Meaning and Philosophy of Numbers

Sherlock Holmes vs Michael Jackson: Mystery or Coincidence in a Resolved Case? (Part 4 of 6)

Now, the fact that the criminals ( for will and order of the professor Moriarty ), have stolen The Mona Lisa in the part 2 of the "The final Problem" and having explained all the contest, I believe that there is not need to add something else because everything it is already enough clear for us( soldiers of love )in this second episode about the anologies the connections and the hidden meanings between this novel and MJJ hoax -
In few words the criminals tried to take away to the people to the whole humanity a good
too precious Our freedom ,our beliefs, our culture,our knowledge our awareness to put in control the mind of all the people with the illusions of the secret organizations and the mental manipolations and control..intrigues made with their dirty deceptive games and illusions.
(Conspiracy.. Illuminati..NWO..)
- Here we are again Like you can see -


Does Holmes need to devise another plan to defeat the enemy and deliver the criminals to justice and re bring peace and the security in his life and in the life to everybody !? -


Indeed He will do it But how he will do it!?
We are not yet in the end There are more coincidences and anologies to discover and to analize- But the Professor Moriarty noted that they had stolen a fake, not the original painting of Mona Lisa it could mean that their deception will not end 'till they will not have achieved what they want-

Indeed, for this time, Holmes managed to fool the criminals and save the picture- the Professor Moriarty ( min 07:00 The Final Problem Part 2 http://youtu.be/4c1pxZ66UmE) get in S:H's house with air threatening looking badly into the eyes Holmes whom he know to be still in danger The danger is just in front of him, but he wanna not use no one weapon but only his cunning and smartness-He face the situation with courage arguing with his enemy smiling in front his face - The professor seem want not stop to threaten Holmes warning him that his is not a danger but a distruction  and Holmes seem not scared at all, rather he invite to his guest to leave his home cus he need to take care of something most important -
The enemy sees that Holmes is a straight a strong brave person and that he will never drop to compromise to terms with no one.
This is exactly what Michael did - He knew of the dangers He was aware about all the risk and the threats received and that we all we are in danger But he continued to make his work untill "the last day" (6/25/2009) without allow to them, never more, to try to control his mind his life his freedom-


We can easily associate the figure of Professor Moriarty with the conspiracies with the NWO with the illuminates and see the connections btw it and MJJ haox one more time
Indeed put a look in these episode "The Valley of Fear" part 1 http://youtu.be/wkzdYW4H0jA
and the part 3 http://youtu.be/MJ91x4yK1d4 did you noticed the triangle in the arms of those who belong to the Freemasonry!? " Illuminati" Another one connection 


Holmes has been tracking Moriarty and his agents for months and is on the brink of snaring them all and delivering them to the dock. Moriarty is the criminal genius behind a highly organized and extremely secret criminal force like we have seen and Holmes will consider it the crowning achievement of his career if only he can defeat Moriarty. Moriarty is out to thwart Holmes's plans and is well capable of doing so, for he is, as Holmes admits, the great detective's intellectual equal.


Holmes asks Watson to come to the continent with him, giving him unusual instructions designed to hide his tracks to Victoria station. Holmes is not quite sure where they will go; this seems rather odd to Watson. Holmes, certain that he has been followed to his friend's house, then makes off by climbing over the back wall in the garden. The next day Watson follows Holmes's instructions to the letter and finds himself waiting in the reserved first class coach for his friend, but only an elderly Italian priest is there. The cleric soon makes it apparent that he is Holmes in disguise.

The electromagnetic fields. Configuration, damage and liability

 -The electromagnetic fields.  Configuration, damage and liability-

The electromagnetic pollution, known under the name of electrosmog it is a phenomenon so far reaching that, to deal the issue, it certainly creates difficulties.
It is about placing magnetic waves, sensually imperceptible in the body of persons,that pollutes
because it is able to interact with biological systems, creating damage to health in the short or long term.
The length of the electromagnetic waves is variable so that the radiation does not necessarily alter the nature of the object that invests, although recently there has gone moving more and more about the possible negative effects that these waves cause in humans.
Our body, indeed, when it is hit by these waves, it is equivalent to an antenna and the different parts of the same react differently: insomnia, headache, irritability, depression, fatigue, and again, nervous system excitation, irritation of the muscles, severe cardiac dysfunction and even the appearance of some types of tumors may be the result of excessive and constant exposure to electromagnetic fields.
Radioactivity has always existed in nature in its double origin: terrestrial or extraterrestrial. The first is generated by radioactive nucleuses present in the inorganic materials of the earth's crust so that radioactive particles are also collected during their flow from groundwater and artesian wells are found in oil or ground. Animals sense the existence of magnetic fields, and avoid them while dogs, cats, however, like to roll in it.
The second comes from cosmic rays interacting with the atmosphere. Sources are the sun, the stars and someweather events such as, for example, electrostatic discharge.Scientific discoveries have made ​​it known how the men were always aware of the existence of radiation. Geoges Lakhovsky, noted researcher of early 1900, wrote: "Every living being emits radiation, the vast majority of living beings is capable of receiving and detecting the waves ..."
and again  "Life is created by radiation, life is maintained by radiation, life is destroyed by an oscillatory imbalance andvibration."

People have maintained, at first, against the radioactivity strange behavior.At first they believed the radiationbeneficial and healthy so that it now absurd, they were even sold syrups energy among the ingredients of whichthere was the radioactive thorium, beauty creams uranium-based machines, which had the function to enter trapsradon in the soda and pads of radon that hung in the ceiling radiated, so as to derive benefit, who was in the roomwith them below! The same mothers, caring and careful with their children, they gave them a bottled watercontainer on which was written "powerfully radioactive":
 Today it would be absurd to do or to believe!Subsequently, the discovery of electricity and the progressive advent of technology exploiting advanced electromagnetic fields, have increased significantly the amount of radiation: they are man-made radiation polluting the environment and harmful to health. They, unlike of the sound, that it needs of the air to spread and that it is harmful only to very high levels and,specifically, when the wave violently strikes the eardrum, they have, as a characteristic, the transfer of energy from one point to another space without movement of the bodies or support of material resources.

When the radiation, placed in the human body, is absorbed by this and, it exceeds the so-called
effect -threshold,  breaking the bonds that hold molecules of living cells, the consequences for human health are devastating. Man is surrounded by an invisible network of electromagnetic waves, whatever its origin, which propagate through space. If radiation is natural and exceed the thresholds of concentration, one speaks of simple pollution, and if artificial, should alter the natural state of equilibrium is called electromagnetic pollution or electrosmog. The disasters of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl, the dissemination of images that represented the terrors and fears generated by the atomic radiation, however, have changed the belief that individuals had over the radioactivity even if the way we do continues to remain ambiguous. How many people during the summer season does not lie down for hours and hours in the sun to tan, accepting with satisfaction the ultraviolet rays?
-The results of scientific research-

Looking at the overall picture of electromagnetic, we must start from the results of scientific research on the subject of radiation damage, developed over the years. Although the first experiments and studies on the intersections between electromagnetic fields and biological systems date back a few centuries ago, only in recent years scientific research has studied the question about the changes at the biological level, and produce these fields were made public the serious problems that may arise to the health of people affected in areas disturbed by radiation or in direct contact with them. Several are the illnesses caused by exposure to electromagnetic fields.

With more and more precise investigation is known that the prolonged presence in an intense electromagnetic field can lead to serious health problems. At first the disturbances are rather generic, following over the years, they can become real diseases that causecentral nervous system disorders of the autonomic nervous, circulatory and endocrine systems.

There is high risk. It and 'a phenomenon in devastating effects, like asbestos and its derivativesThere are numerous epidemiological and laboratory studies. Under study are not only harmful effects of radiation in the frequencies used in the production, transport and the use of electrical energy, but also those attributable tomedium-high frequencies used in communications (eg mobile phones).



Health effects from radiofrequency Electromagnetic fields
http://wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/HPAmobile2012.pdf

The AGNIR (Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation) has produced a report on behalf of the UK Health Protection Agency (HPA).  The document is entitled 'Health Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields', April 2012.

The HPA state "The report finds that although a substantial amount of research has been conducted, there is no convincing evidence that radiofrequency field exposure below internationally agreed guideline levels (which are applied in the UK) causes health effects in adults or children".  However, the chairman of the AGNIR is responsible for setting the existing guidelines (part of ICNIRP), introducing a potential conflict of interest. 

The report lists many studies finding damaging biological and health effects from radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below current guidelines, but manages to dismiss them for various reasons.  Some studies had been omitted.

No mention was made of the decision by the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to classify radiofrequency radiation as possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on scientific evidence (May 2011). 

Professor Dariusz Leszcynski from the Finnish Radiation Protection Agency has commented that he considers the UK HPA report to be biased and misleading.  "Unlike the claims on HPA website the UK HPA AGNIR Report 2012 is not a comprehensive review but it is a biased review." "It is obvious that the AGNIR's members do not agree with the outcome of IARC evaluation. However, complete omission of it feels like rewriting of history and omitting inconvenient facts. In my opinion it shows a very biased attitude of AGNIR members towards the IARC classification. After all, in cancer research the IARC evaluations are a "gold standard"."

We illustrate the misleading nature of the report with an example here:

Male Fertility

The report has separated out studies into different sections making it harder to view all of the evidence for fertility together.  But we have brought together all of the male fertility studies mentioned in the report.  78% of the studies listed found decreased measures of male fertility or damage to sperm.

For studies into human male fertility the report lists 4 studies since 2003, all of which find decreased male fertility for users of mobile phones or exposure to military radiofrequency equipment (Agarwal et al., 2008; Fejes et al 2005; Baste et al., 2008; Møllerløkken and Moen 2008; p.257). Four studies were omitted (listed below, A), which also all find damage to human male fertility for users of mobile phones.  So all 8 studies in humans mentioned since 2003 find decreased male fertility associated with mobile phone use/possession or exposure to other radiofrequency fields.

For studies on isolated human sperm samples, 4 studies were mentioned (Erogul et al., 2006; Falzone et al., 2008; De Iuliis et al., 2009; Agarwal et al., 2009; p.102).  All 4 find damaging changes in the sperm which would be expected to decrease male fertility.  Some studies were omitted (listed below, B).  Of those omitted, 2 found damaging effects and 1 didn't.

For possible damage to DNA/genotoxicity of sperm the report mentions 2 studies: Falzone et al 2010 (p.85, human sperm) which found no damage to DNA and De Iuliis et al 2009 (p.102) where there was damage to human sperm DNA following mobile phone exposure.  The report missed out Aitken et al 2005 which found DNA damage in mice sperm following mobile phone exposure.  The report also failed to mention damage to human sperm DNA found following exposure to a Wi-Fi-enabled laptop (Avandaño et al. 2012).  Of the 2 studies mentioned 1 found damage to human DNA and 1 didn't.  If the 2 missing papers are included, there are 3 finding DNA damage and 1 finding no effect.  

Male fertility studies in animals listed (p.179-181) included 14 studies, 10 of which found damage to fertility and 4 found no effect (Ozguner et al., 2005; Ribeiro et al., 2007; Yan et al., 2007; Dasdaǧ et al., 2008; Yilmaz et al., 2008; Mailankot et al., 2009; Salama et al., 2010a; Salama et al., 2009; Salama et al., 2010b; Otitoloju et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2010; Subbotina et al., 2006; Kumar et al., 2011; Kesari and Behari 2010). Some studies were omitted (listed below, D).  In the studies left out, 6 found damage to fertility or sperm and 2 had no effect.

So of the studies listed in the present report, 18 found decreased measures of male fertility or damage to sperm (78%) and 5 found no effect.  If the omitted studies are included in the data then 32 found damaging effects (80%) and 8 didn't (20%).  Astonishingly, the conclusion was that there remains no convincing evidence that radiofrequency fields below current guidelines have any effect on male fertility.  The word 'convincing' is a very subjective one and is mentioned a lot throughout the report.  The authors were not convinced by the 18 papers finding measures of decreased male fertility, but were more convinced by the 5 which had found no effect.  It isn't just about numbers, considering the quality of the studies is also important.  But it is hard to understand how an honest assessment of the scientific literature could possibly conclude that there remains no (convincing) evidence that radiofrequency radiation can decrease male fertility.

Admitting that there may be effects on male fertility from radiofrequency radiation does not mean that we have all of the answers or that further research is not needed.  It would however give the public a more honest view of the scientific literature and allow them to take measures to reduce their exposure if they chose to.  Protecting public health means being honest about risks so that people can make informed choices.  Telling people that everything is OK when the majority of studies are finding decreased fertility is not honest.

Find Out What Is Your Love and LOve Life

I know there are times, things are tough. Some things are more, when we are older.
Even if I’m not alone online.. even if I’ve close Friends here.. even if I’ve a Soul 
Mate on earth.. 
I’m more & more older each year that pass away.

I have no one in my real life.. no one who care, who hug me, who hold my hand.
I dont know how many time I still will be on earth.. but, I want to meet my True Love.. 
and live with until the end.

I know that True Love, is to feel the life.. and live through the eyes and the Love of 
another one.. 
I never meet this True Love..this true person..

Life is what it is.. 
People cross our life.. 
All people haven’t the same goal, nor the same way, nor the same definition of the verb 
“Aimer”.

Some play with us.. Some use us.. 
Some just need travel’s friend for a while.. 
And sometimes.. we are only a step for others.

Difficult to find.. Difficult to trust.. Difficult to wait.. 
Difficult to have so much love in my heart & not being able to share it, with someone in 
my life. 
It’s sad & sometime painful to be alone with the half of a heart..

“When we miss Love… we miss to live” …
Don’t miss your life.. find your Love

Sherlock Holmes vs Michael Jackson: Mystery or Coincidence in a Resolved Case? (Part 3 of 6)

Who stole Mona Lisa and this gesture made by the criminals what connection could it have or hide with the MJJ hoax What could it mean!?
http://youtu.be/4c1pxZ66UmE    
Mona Lisa (La Gioconda or La Joconde, or Portrait of Lisa Gherardini, wife of Francesco del Giocondo) is a half-length portrait of a woman by the Italian artist "Leonardo da Vinci", which has been acclaimed as "the best known, the most visited, the most written about, the most sung about, the most parodied work of art in the world -
The painting, thought to be a portrait of Lisa Gherardini,the wife of Francesco del Giocondo,is believed to have been painted between 1503 and 1506. It was acquired by King Francis I of France and is now the property of the French Republic,on permanent display at the Musée du Louvre in Paris.
The "ambiguity" of the subject's expression,frequently described as "enigmatic",the monumentality of the composition,the subtle modeling of forms and the atmospheric "illusionism" were novel qualities that have contributed to the continuing fascination and study of the work.


The painting's title Mona Lisa stems from a description by Giorgio Vasari: "Leonardo undertook to paint, for Francesco del Giocondo, the portrait of Mona Lisa, his wife...."[4][5] In Italian, madonna means my "lady". This became "madonna" the name used to call our vergin Lady in Italy, and its contraction mona. Mona was thus a polite form of address, similar to Ma’am, Madam, or my lady in English.
Though traditionally spelled "Mona" in modern Italian, this short form of madonna is now usually spelled Monna. The title is therefore sometimes given as Monna Lisa, but this is rare in English. "Monna Lisa" is the normal spelling in modern Italian
The "madonna" The Lady, she represents the sacredness the faith the purity the salvation the compassion the goodness the sweetness the divine knowledge the eternal life through the ascension of the Virgin Mary to heaven - 
The picture has been painted by Leonardo Da Vinci 
which represents the knowledge the immagination 
science discovery to the invention, the genius ', the experimentation, innovation, creativity', the optical illusion, the mysteries hidden in his paintings and works yet to be discovered and reveal in all its mystery and majesty 'who inspired other genes after him but never anyone like him. 
He was a painter, sculptor, architect, musician, scientist, mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, geologist, cartographer, botanist, and writer whose genius, perhaps more than that of any other figure. But not less important we should remember that he was one of the components of the a society secret Priory of Sion 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priory_of_Sion
see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Grail

The Hidden Symbolism Of One World Trade Center.