Twitter

FOLLOW ON TWITTER... YOUTUBE ... FACEBOOK
Showing posts with label Health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health. Show all posts

Monday, November 5, 2012

The kiss of death

Within these walls of blood and bone
the core of me is lifeless stone
forgetting faith, forever weak
never trust, never speak

under my mask, horror abides
once revealed, it will not hide
my true being, deranged and sick
which side of me would you pick?

my shell is breath taking, not a single flaw
my voice is enchanting, my beckoning call
my body is tight, your perfect dream
but who i truly am, would make you scream

beneath this layer of simple skin
lies a demon bedded within
cold and dark, it never sleeps
evil, mad, meager, weak

I came into this country without getting caught, and now everyday i am hunted and sought.
Whole nations have gathered to plan my destruction..they call me a breeder of crime and corruption.
I am more deadly then whiskey, more deadly then wine..hence i am known as the scourge of mankind.
I come in a powder thats nothing but waste, i look soft and fluffy, but im bitter to the taste.
I am brown, I am white..but deadly to use..but once your addicted i really abuse

From heads of state to the lowest of scum..i give you my word they'll be under my thumb.
I will take a richman and make him poor..i'll take a virgin and make her a whore.
I will make you lie,steal,borrow,and beg.
You will search for a vein in your arm or leg.
I will make you selfish and fill you with greed..regaurdless of color,religon, or creed.
My gift is an illusion, my blessing is fake, death and destruction follow my wake.
I am the kiss of death to all i touch..i start as a gift and end as a crutch.

Friday, June 29, 2012

When Fear Attracks Danger: Beware of Anyone That Insults Others

Today I am going to write an article about FEAR. It is going to be a long reading and quite difficult to understand but I hope you will take your time to read it calmly and think about it. Because, we can feel fear, but do we really know what FEAR is..?

Far from what we have been taught by, our emotions act as "channelers" ("Action of modifying our Calcium Ion to acelerate our internal transactions and generate the Lithium that energizes us from whitin.")
From what I have told, there is not doubt. The question is: WHY ARE TOO MANY INTERESTED IN BREAKING THAT PROCESS OF CHANNELING?

The answer is simple: Because when humans will be aware of that process of Channeling, they will adquire the power previously unknown: "The ability to generate inner creativity"...against all odds, rain, thunder...not matter what happens out there...inside there is a Channel that is in permanent connection with The Universe.
Tradiotionally, in the word of rational psychology, it was decretred that the fear a defense mechanism to avoid a "greater evil". The truth is that we know now that fear is a bad "paralyzing" using the mechanisms of "Ego" even paralyzes the attitude of "I". It is curious that those who are trapped in fear, trigger mechanisms "Ego" by projection, creative paralysis, anger and hatred.

Invaluable was the work of Hameroff in the late nineteenth century. They found that the deaf could compose music. The key to the human capacity to make up emotions that have nothing to do with the instincts and / or feelings. The feelings are the result of external stimulation, while emotions come from internal generation. No inner life can not have emotions. No internal genesis theories can not be created or songs, or art or life.

The fear is DEATH, The Emotion is LIFE. Our education has taught us to assertively assertiveness transform all external stimulitation involving aggression towards us. Big mistake! We manage our feelings and we often invades the sense of fear. If that happens to us is because our biophysical stimulitations are outstanding social predator that stalks us and we generate fear. Often, we move from what others say or think about someone and go with the crowd current because we think about their external reaction. Appears fear of saying, of feelingl, of living, of creating, of progressing. We are afraid of going ahead and walk our path of creative thinking. Well .... This is the beginning of the end of our dearest FEAR.


What is fear?

Fear is a program of pre-frontal lobe our (reason) that tells us something external and / or internal social threatens the performance of our (pre-frontal) "Ego" to the detriment of the "I". So to speak, is an inheritance from our animal NDA. The densest part of our being, which reacts viscerally and intelligently.

Paradoxically, the incidence of fear in our central nervous system (CNS) generates levels of adrenaline and stress overload initially AMPA and NMDA charge exchange at synapses. This reaction leads to paralysis "predictable" or "crippling" as to such stimuli, the body reacts mainly from the survival instinct. Then fear enable animal survival mechanism intead of enabling the intellect. Certainly, over such stimulitation, reacts with an action of a similar nature to the contingency, to try to safeguard our physical and / or social, which continues to be the effect of fear, causing agents claim. So, fear attracts danger, and that interacts with the subject deceased, whose claim is just that .."paralyze the action of the receiver module."

It turns out that this fear comes from an animal evolution as a reminiscence of a time when there were continually lurking predators, survival in a hostile context in which the "Cro-Magnon" should ensure continuous supply and keep its young lass differentiating and imposing wild beasts that roamed their usual habitat. Gradually imposed "roles" and as they were a matriarchal society and / or patriarchal, that evolved separately in the maintenance of offspring as the ultimate goal of the consort, and the need / obligation to procure food and protect family / clan.

The Mammoth threatened and imposed fear, like other mammals with which the "homo sapiens" should coexist and prevail in the food chain, which led him to survive and develop socially the "clan" to "tribe" and the "tribe" to "Village" and "Village" to "collective" and "collective" to "Social Role". Currently, the "Social Role" is an optimal incentive protected by the constitutions of almost all advanced countries. The right of Diignity, Honor, Privacy, and so on...

Our physical architecture has been developed under these canons and the logic of those patterns. So far we live with a scientific model that advocates social and philosophical matter, the immediate materialization, early and short-term success, hedonism punctual and comfortable, and the satisfaction of the senses and ignores the emotions and feelings.

However, we evolved quickly and intelligently to a very different context: There is no longer a predator waiting at the exit of the cave that threatens our survival. There is not a bison that can test our skills as hunters for daily survival of our offspring. Nor a lion territory disputes with us. So ... What kind of predators lurk to react with fear...?

"Psychological Predators"

The continued well-being. maintaining the "role" and transaction security in exchange for freedom, have gradually led to "homo sapiens" the worst exclavitudes: The constant need for "self-recognition" in their immediate social and mediate. The question of "competence", the "competent" is the greatest threat when questioned by others, but especially tragic for "some" is when this issue occurs in their immediate environment and / or family.

Certainly, the most dangerous weapon of the XXI century is precisely that: "The question of incompetence." The "social ridicule" and "social ostracism". These consequences are the biggest fear may come to breed in the "homo sapiens". That is where the fear reaches its greatest impact, precisely because the subject does not have an inner balance, is extremely vulnerable to external threat of losing their "status", "competence", his "social credibility".
Obviously the system has been designed to operate such limits to those who "dare" transgress "orthodoxy".

If we react to such threats with fear, our "Ego" will impose to our "I", and fall victims of manipulation psycho- paralyzing the whole process of creativity. Those who impose the logic of fear are real experts in social predation.
Under that apparent guise of "assertiveness" and "soft" hides a whole network of absolute superficiality that when the time comes, will become into "anger", "hate" and "moral aggression."

However ... They know that everyday, the thousands who awaken to the new danger is not the buffalo, or bison, or mammoth, but the "predator-destroyer" of creative initiatives. It is not coincidence that 80% of the European adult population over 45 with higher education, is literally "awakening" and spending "some" or even "all" their time to work spread of "conscience."


The key is the Will.

As Ancient Greek philosophers said, the key is to not be swayed by the passions, trying to take decisions consciously and enjoying the positive energy that emanates from within. As we generate the energy accelerates the fractal process. The more relaxed you are the CNS, the greater our inner life. The higher the inner life, the less fear. The lower the fear, the greater the creativity and the feeling of LOVE for those around us. The higher the energy, enjoy conversations increasingly sterile, superficial and / or banal. As the process progresses, we begin to need less and enjoy more of the people, delivery and happiness of the beings around us.

It is the will of our "I" our "BE" imposing our "EGO". Once this process begins, the effects are irreversible, since it knows the meaning of true happiness. Moreover, the opening of the centres AMPA and NMDA receptors, stimulates the interaction of Channeling with Calmodulin activates the Lithium and generates a serie of modifications in the processes of absorption of proteins by NDA, slow aging and oxidation and triggers a sense of inexhaustible energy.

As a curiosity Homo "Cognos" has become into a Channeler. He feels connected to the Intelligent Universe, and transactional million packets per second. His mind is connected with others and begins to walk away from those who still cling to anger, hatred and fear. He begins to see and perceives the emotions of others and interacts with them nonverbally, with their own emotions. He does not conceive violence, war and chaos. So, either the fear or hatred or anger.

Monday, June 18, 2012

The electromagnetic fields. Configuration, damage and liability


 -The electromagnetic fields.  Configuration, damage and liability-

The electromagnetic pollution, known under the name of electrosmog it is a phenomenon so far reaching that, to deal the issue, it certainly creates difficulties.
It is about placing magnetic waves, sensually imperceptible in the body of persons,that pollutes
because it is able to interact with biological systems, creating damage to health in the short or long term.
The length of the electromagnetic waves is variable so that the radiation does not necessarily alter the nature of the object that invests, although recently there has gone moving more and more about the possible negative effects that these waves cause in humans.
Our body, indeed, when it is hit by these waves, it is equivalent to an antenna and the different parts of the same react differently: insomnia, headache, irritability, depression, fatigue, and again, nervous system excitation, irritation of the muscles, severe cardiac dysfunction and even the appearance of some types of tumors may be the result of excessive and constant exposure to electromagnetic fields.
Radioactivity has always existed in nature in its double origin: terrestrial or extraterrestrial. The first is generated by radioactive nucleuses present in the inorganic materials of the earth's crust so that radioactive particles are also collected during their flow from groundwater and artesian wells are found in oil or ground. Animals sense the existence of magnetic fields, and avoid them while dogs, cats, however, like to roll in it.
The second comes from cosmic rays interacting with the atmosphere. Sources are the sun, the stars and someweather events such as, for example, electrostatic discharge.
Scientific discoveries have made ​​it known how the men were always aware of the existence of radiation. Geoges Lakhovsky, noted researcher of early 1900, wrote: "Every living being emits radiation, the vast majority of living beings is capable of receiving and detecting the waves ..."
and again  "Life is created by radiation, life is maintained by radiation, life is destroyed by an oscillatory imbalance andvibration."

People have maintained, at first, against the radioactivity strange behavior.
At first they believed the radiationbeneficial and healthy so that it now absurd, they were even sold syrups energy among the ingredients of whichthere was the radioactive thorium, beauty creams uranium-based machines, which had the function to enter trapsradon in the soda and pads of radon that hung in the ceiling radiated, so as to derive benefit, who was in the roomwith them below! The same mothers, caring and careful with their children, they gave them a bottled watercontainer on which was written "powerfully radioactive":
 Today it would be absurd to do or to believe!
Subsequently, the discovery of electricity and the progressive advent of technology exploiting advanced electromagnetic fields, have increased significantly the amount of radiationthey are man-made radiation polluting the environment and harmful to healthThey, unlike of the sound, that it needs of the air to spread and that it is harmful only to very high levels and,specifically, when the wave violently strikes the eardrum, they have, as a characteristic, the transfer of energy from one point to another space without movement of the bodies or support of material resources.

When the radiation, placed in the human body, is absorbed by this and, it exceeds the so-called
effect -threshold,  breaking the bonds that hold molecules of living cells, the consequences for human health are devastating. Man is surrounded by an invisible network of electromagnetic waves, whatever its origin, which propagate through space. If radiation is natural and exceed the thresholds of concentration, one speaks of simple pollution, and if artificial, should alter the natural state of equilibrium is called electromagnetic pollution or electrosmog. The disasters of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl, the dissemination of images that represented the terrors and fears generated by the atomic radiation, however, have changed the belief that individuals had over the radioactivity even if the way we do continues to remain ambiguous. How many people during the summer season does not lie down for hours and hours in the sun to tan, accepting with satisfaction the ultraviolet rays?
-The results of scientific research-

Looking at the overall picture of electromagnetic, we must start from the results of scientific research on the subject of radiation damage, developed over the years. 
Although the first experiments and studies on the intersections between electromagnetic fields and biological systems date back a few centuries ago, only in recent years scientific research has studied the question about the changes at the biological level, and produce these fields were made public the serious problems that may arise to the health of people affected in areas disturbed by radiation or in direct contact with themSeveral are the illnesses caused by exposure to electromagnetic fields.

With more and more precise investigation is known that the prolonged presence in an intense electromagnetic field can lead to serious health problems. At first the disturbances are rather generic, following over the years, they can become real diseases that causecentral nervous system disorders of the autonomic nervous, circulatory and endocrine systems.

There is high risk. It and 'a phenomenon in devastating effects, like asbestos and its derivatives
There are numerous epidemiological and laboratory studies. Under study are not only harmful effects of radiation in the frequencies used in the production, transport and the use of electrical energy, but also those attributable tomedium-high frequencies used in communications (eg mobile phones).



Health effects from radiofrequency Electromagnetic fields
http://wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/HPAmobile2012.pdf
The AGNIR (Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation) has produced a report on behalf of the UK Health Protection Agency (HPA).  The document is entitled 'Health Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields', April 2012.

The HPA state "The report finds that although a substantial amount of research has been conducted, there is no convincing evidence that radiofrequency field exposure below internationally agreed guideline levels (which are applied in the UK) causes health effects in adults or children".  However, the chairman of the AGNIR is responsible for setting the existing guidelines (part of ICNIRP), introducing a potential conflict of interest. 
The report lists many studies finding damaging biological and health effects from radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below current guidelines, but manages to dismiss them for various reasons.  Some studies had been omitted.
No mention was made of the decision by the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to classify radiofrequency radiation as possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on scientific evidence (May 2011). 

Professor Dariusz Leszcynski from the Finnish Radiation Protection Agency has commented that he considers the UK HPA report to be biased and misleading.  "Unlike the claims on HPA website the UK HPA AGNIR Report 2012 is not a comprehensive review but it is a biased review." "It is obvious that the AGNIR's members do not agree with the outcome of IARC evaluation. However, complete omission of it feels like rewriting of history and omitting inconvenient facts. In my opinion it shows a very biased attitude of AGNIR members towards the IARC classification. After all, in cancer research the IARC evaluations are a "gold standard"."
We illustrate the misleading nature of the report with an example here:
Male Fertility
The report has separated out studies into different sections making it harder to view all of the evidence for fertility together.  But we have brought together all of the male fertility studies mentioned in the report.  78% of the studies listed found decreased measures of male fertility or damage to sperm.
For studies into human male fertility the report lists 4 studies since 2003, all of which find decreased male fertility for users of mobile phones or exposure to military radiofrequency equipment (Agarwal et al., 2008; Fejes et al 2005; Baste et al., 2008; Møllerløkken and Moen 2008; p.257). Four studies were omitted (listed below, A), which also all find damage to human male fertility for users of mobile phones.  So all 8 studies in humans mentioned since 2003 find decreased male fertility associated with mobile phone use/possession or exposure to other radiofrequency fields.
For studies on isolated human sperm samples, 4 studies were mentioned (Erogul et al., 2006; Falzone et al., 2008; De Iuliis et al., 2009; Agarwal et al., 2009; p.102).  All 4 find damaging changes in the sperm which would be expected to decrease male fertility.  Some studies were omitted (listed below, B).  Of those omitted, 2 found damaging effects and 1 didn't.
For possible damage to DNA/genotoxicity of sperm the report mentions 2 studies: Falzone et al 2010 (p.85, human sperm) which found no damage to DNA and De Iuliis et al 2009 (p.102) where there was damage to human sperm DNA following mobile phone exposure.  The report missed out Aitken et al 2005 which found DNA damage in mice sperm following mobile phone exposure.  The report also failed to mention damage to human sperm DNA found following exposure to a Wi-Fi-enabled laptop (Avandaño et al. 2012).  Of the 2 studies mentioned 1 found damage to human DNA and 1 didn't.  If the 2 missing papers are included, there are 3 finding DNA damage and 1 finding no effect.  
Male fertility studies in animals listed (p.179-181) included 14 studies, 10 of which found damage to fertility and 4 found no effect (Ozguner et al., 2005; Ribeiro et al., 2007; Yan et al., 2007; Dasdaǧ et al., 2008; Yilmaz et al., 2008; Mailankot et al., 2009; Salama et al., 2010a; Salama et al., 2009; Salama et al., 2010b; Otitoloju et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2010; Subbotina et al., 2006; Kumar et al., 2011; Kesari and Behari 2010). Some studies were omitted (listed below, D).  In the studies left out, 6 found damage to fertility or sperm and 2 had no effect.
So of the studies listed in the present report, 18 found decreased measures of male fertility or damage to sperm (78%) and 5 found no effect.  If the omitted studies are included in the data then 32 found damaging effects (80%) and 8 didn't (20%).  Astonishingly, the conclusion was that there remains no convincing evidence that radiofrequency fields below current guidelines have any effect on male fertility.  The word 'convincing' is a very subjective one and is mentioned a lot throughout the report.  The authors were not convinced by the 18 papers finding measures of decreased male fertility, but were more convinced by the 5 which had found no effect.  It isn't just about numbers, considering the quality of the studies is also important.  But it is hard to understand how an honest assessment of the scientific literature could possibly conclude that there remains no (convincing) evidence that radiofrequency radiation can decrease male fertility.
Admitting that there may be effects on male fertility from radiofrequency radiation does not mean that we have all of the answers or that further research is not needed.  It would however give the public a more honest view of the scientific literature and allow them to take measures to reduce their exposure if they chose to.  Protecting public health means being honest about risks so that people can make informed choices.  Telling people that everything is OK when the majority of studies are finding decreased fertility is not honest.








Monday, June 11, 2012

Reflections on Medications

There are people dying of medicines prescribed on prescriptions, without abuse, and 
without knowing that they will die..
We must not forget that drugs are chemicals.. chemical molecules that the human body 
can’t tolerate.. 

I’m myself allergic to drugs (penicillin, aspirin, anti-inflammatory..). Nothing is 
natural, and nothing is harmless .. 
You can do a physical allergic shock, or coma, or die .. Babies die of a simple 
vaccination, which seems so harmless .. But they don’t do drugs & don’t abuse of them.. 
We must not forget that even if a drug appears innocuous to some, it may be very 
dangerous or even fatal for others.

Personally, I take rarely medication, even sick.. and although I have some problems for 
to sleep, i take nothing..
There is 4 or 5 generations, Prozac, Xanax, and others.. didn’t exist .. People had a 
health better than ours.. They were not accroc to drug, and we didn’t hear about drug, 
not as now.

I think people of that time weren’t obsess for these little things, for which some attach 
great attention now, and for which, some think that in taking drugs, everything will be 
better .. Is it true? Are you better after taking them?

Once, my sister said.. “I’ll take a pill, I think I’ll soon have a headache” … WHAT IT 
MEANS??

Do you think each time you take some meds, you really need them? 
Sometimes, it’s a placebo.. nothing else..

An antibiotic is not required during infection against a virus, and yet, some patients 
ask their doctor .. or doctors prescribe them themselves, because they are affiliated 
with laboratories.. 

Don’t forget, that our body has its army inside with his little soldiers.. that helps us 
fight colds and small minor injuries .. 
I’m fortunate to have a doctor who takes his oath of Hippocrate seriously.. He does not 
works with Laboratories.. He is a “real Doctor” ..

There are so many people worldwide who suffer from real illnesses, and that require 
medical treatments in long-term, or life … And so many people, in the third world, who 
suffer and who die because they have no medicines to cure..

On one side, a great abuse of medications… and… on the other side, a huge lack of care.

The pharmaceutical industry ?!?!?

Is it become a lifestyle? a mode? a fear? 

Do we really need to hide us behind drugs, to be better in our heads, or our bodies?

Have we a better life with them?

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Paralyzed rats walk again in Swiss lab study



 Scientists in Switzerland have restored full movement to rats paralyzed by spinal cord injuries, in a study that might eventually be useful for people with similar injuries.

Gregoire Courtine and his team at Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne sawrats with severe paralysis walking and running again, after a combination of electrical and chemical stimulation of the spinal cord together with robotic support.

“Our rats are not only voluntarily initiating a walking gait, but they are soon sprinting, climbing up stairs and avoiding obstacles,” said Courtine, whose results from the five-year study will be published in the journal Science on Friday.

Courtine is quick to point out that it remains unclear whether a similar technique could help people with spinal cord damage. But he adds the technique does hint at new ways of treating paralysis.
Other scientists agree.This is ground-breaking research and offers great hope for the future of restoring function to spinal injured patients,” said Elizabeth Bradbury, a Medical Research Council senior fellow at King’s College London.

But Bradbury noted that very few human spinal cord injuries are the result of a direct cut through the cord, which is what the rats had. Human injuries are most often the result of bruising or compression, and it is unclear whether the technique could be translated to this type of injury. It is also not known whether this kind of electro-chemical “kick-start” could help a spinal cord that has been damaged for a long time, with complications such as scar tissue, holes and a large number of nerve cells and fibers that have died or degenerated.

Nevertheless, Courtine’s work demonstrates a way of encouraging and increasing the innate ability of the spinal cord to repair itself, a quality known as neuroplasticity. Other attempts to repair spinal cords have focused on stem cell therapy. The brain and spinal cord can adapt and recover from small injuries. This new study proves that recovery from severe injury is possible if the dormant spinal column is “woken up.”

Norman Saunders, a neuroscientist at the University of Melbourne in Australia, said in an e-mailed statement reacting to the study that although it remains to be seen whether the technique can be used successfully on people, “it looks more promising than previously proposed treatments for spinal cord injury.” Bryce Vissel, head of the Neuro­degenerative Diseases Research Laboratory at the Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Sydney, said the study “suggests we are on the edge of a truly profound advance in modern medicine: the prospect of repairing the spinal cord after injury.”

Courtine hopes to start human trials in a year or two at Balgrist University Hospital Spinal Cord Injury Center in Zurich.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Children Dying in Syria... WHY???

There are innocent people dying. They've done nothing wrong, yet they are being killed. I have posted a link to a video, but did not want to post it directly on the blog. The images for some may be to much. So I do warn you on the graphics of the video!

Forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad went on a systematic killing spree, murdering at least 108 people. Most shockingly, the killers targeted women and children. A U.N. representative said the victims included 49 children who were younger than 10. The al-Assad regime denied it carried out the atrocities, but U.N. officials said they saw clear evidence that the Syrian government was involved in the attacks.

http://cnn.com/video/?/video/international/2012/05/28/pkg-jamjoom-houla-children-salughtered.cnn

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

What Is Our World Becoming???




When I heard about three police offers who wound up using a taser on a pregnant woman in Seattle, my first thought was that the story was some kind of a joke. Cops tasering a pregnant woman? In some sort of attempt to subdue her? For real?! You gotta be kidding me.

Apparently these three officers become enraged when they pulled Malaika Brooks over for a moving violation while driving her 11 yr old son to school, and she refused to sign the ticket they gave her because she didn't want to admit being guilty when she didn't feel she'd done anyting wrong. But in the state of Washington, it's a crimbe to refuse to sign a ticket, so they proceeded to arrest her. When Malaika then refused to get out of her car because she was in her last trimester of pregnancy, the cops must have felt really threatened, because that's when they tased her on her leg, arm and neck. And that's where the case gets even crazier.

Not only was she convincted for not signing the ticket, but after suing the officers because of pain and scars left by the taser, the circuit court ruled in their favor!But apparently getting away with using a stun gun on a pregnant woman wasn't enough for these guys, because now they've appealed their case to the Supreme Court in the hopes of getting a final ruling that they were not in the wrong by tasing Brooks. (Whaaatttt??). Who exactly do these guys think they are? First they use a stun gun on a woman who is carrying a child in her womb, and then after being told it was ok, they want addition justification for their actions? It souns like this has much more to do with the officers egos then with whether or not using the taser was wrong. Honestly, were they really so afraid of this woman and that she might escape and out run them?  What a bunch of wusses! I only hope the Supreme Courth finds their appeal as laughable as most people obviously will. Don't you think the cops could have choosen a different method? 

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Baby Boomers At Risk


 
For the first time, health officials are proposing that all baby boomers get tested for hepatitis C. Anyone born from 1945 to 1965 should get a one-time blood test  to see if they have the liver-destroying virus, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in draft recommendations issued Friday.
The often undiagnosed virus is contracted through contact with blood from an infected person. While the risk of infection  has dropped dramatically since the early 1990s, many older adults are still at risk, according to the CDC, which released the draft guidelines.
Baby boomers account for 2 million of the 3.2 million Americans infected with the blood-borne virus. The virus can take decades to cause liver damage, and many people don't know they're infected. According to the CDC, one in 30 baby boomers has been infected with hepatitis C.
CDC officials believe the new measure could lead 800,000 more baby boomers to get treatment and could save more than 120,000 lives.
The virus causes serious liver disease, including liver cancer - the fastest-rising cause of cancer-related deaths - and is the leading cause of liver transplants in the United States.
The hepatitis C virus is most commonly spread today through sharing needles to inject drugs. Before widespread screening of blood donations began in 1992, it was also spread through blood transfusions.
Health officials believe hundreds of thousands of new hepatitis C infections were occurring each year in the 1970s and 1980s, most of them in the younger adults of the era — the baby boomers. The hepatitis C virus was first identified in 1989.

Vaccines A Must For Education???



 A Austin Community College  has divulged that enrollment numbers are collapsing due to students refusing to comply with vaccinations they are told are mandatory in order to take classes.
The ACC administrator has stated that some 10,000 students have refused to enroll because of their refusal to take inoculations. Although waivers for religious or personal objections are available, the ACC source said students were being given the impression that the inoculations are compulsory.
Indeed, college authorities are lying to students by telling them they will be refused enrolment if they don’t take the shots, according to the source. This has led to a staggering 15 per cent decline in students enrolling since January and forced ACC to cancel 500 classes over the next semester alone.
When students are asked why they are dropping out or failing to enroll, huge numbers of them are citing the institution’s aggressive vaccination policy. According to the administrator, a similar pattern of dropouts due to students revolting over vaccines  is being witnessed across the country.
Our source did not wish to be named but expressed her desire to alert the general public about the fact that the situation had turned into a major crisis for Austin Community College, which is the second largest institution of higher learning in Central Texas.

This is yet another example of how the greed of the pharmaceutical industry, in its quest to profit from an ever growing number of vaccines forced on children and young people, is actually destroying an entire area of the economy.
The process bears some similarities to how the travel industry has been ravaged by aggressive, invasive and pointless security measures directed against tourists by the TSA and other government agencies, measures that cost some $600 billion in lost revenue.

Once again the government is trying to control our children, and dictate their education by saying they have to have vaccines to get an education. We need to wake up and realize what our government is trying to do to “the people”.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Propofol Now Used For Death Drug!!


Just in from our old faithful TMZ


Dr. Conrad Murray may have been ahead of his time ... because the drug that killed Michael Jackson will now be used to put people to death in Missouri. 

The Missouri Department of Corrections has announced it has opted to ditch the previous 3-drug cocktail method for lethal injections ... and replace it with one giant helping of Propofol. 

Missouri would be the first state to use Propofol for the purpose of executing someone EVER. 

So far, it's unclear when MO will begin using Propofol to kill people ... but there are 19 condemned men who could go on the chopping block in the very near future. 

I really wonder when all the connections to MJ's "death" will stop being compared to other thing in our world? 

Monday, May 21, 2012

AND TIMING IS CRUCIAL



6/24/2009
Last rehearsal
6/25/2009
1:30 am ~ goes to bed
1:30 am ~ 10mg valium
2:00 am ~ 2mg ativan via iv (he already had an iv in 30 min? That’s a lil drastic even for someone of that status)
3:00 am ~ 2mg versed via iv
5:00 am ~ 2mg ativan via iv
7:30 am ~ 2mg versed via iv
10:40 am ~ 25mg propofol
10:50 am ~ Murray goes to bathroom
10:52 am ~ Murray says he came back to the room, didn't he check on MJ to make sure he was ok?
10:52 am~ 11:18 am = 26 min lapse of time?
11:18 am ~ Murray on phone with 3 separate calls for 47 minutes
11:18 am to 12:05 pm ~ Time Murray is on the phone (47 min) (you really think Murray is gonna stand over MJ and talk on the phone, while getting his much needed rest?)
12:05 pm ~ Murray off phone says returned to room to find MJ not breathing, but says exact time is unknown.
12:05 pm ~ 2mg of reversal drug Anexate (why does this take 5 min?) Its said that Murray did CPR for 25-30 min during this time. How is that possible if at 12:10 he goes to get security after performing CR for 25-30 min. Wouldn’t he have had to find MJ in the middle of a phone call?
12:10 pm ~ Murray called security to call for help (if Murray is running down stairs to get security who is doing CPR?)
12:21 pm ~ 911 call (why does it take 11 mins to make a 30 second call?)
12:25 pm ~ Ambulance arrives
12:40 pm ~ Ben Evenstad arrives ~ how did Ben get there so fast after the Ambulance? 15 mins?
1:06 pm Ambulance left the home of MJ.
Total time Ambulance was at the home 12:25 ~ 1:06 = 41 min. Isn’t one of the first rules that you take as least time as possible at the place to get them to the hospital faster?
2.7 mile trip from Michaels house to hospital, takes 8 min. This was an unusual route, who cares if the paparazzi is following you!
1:14 pm ~ EMT’s arrive at hospital with Michael
1:30 pm ~ The world gets notice of Michael falling ill. (but its said he was already gone at this time)
2:26 pm ~ Time of death is stated by Jermaine. How can that be the correct time if 56 min earlier he was supposedly already “gone”? Also why did Jermaine feel the need to say “My brother the Legendary King of Pop Michael Jackson, passed away on Thursday June 25th 2009 at 2:26pm” It was obvious that he passed away on that day…so why say the whole date? 5th day of the week, 6th month, 2009, 2:26! What would be the purpose of all those numbers?
2 hours and 5 min ~ from first call to time of reported “death”
According to the timeline if CPR was 25 min long then 911 called at 12:21 he went down at 11:56 (56 again)
Stated that drug had been given for 6 weeks prior to that day. Sold in 20mL or 50mL or 100mL. 6x200mg=1200 mg, 6x500mg=3000mg, 6x1000=6000mg. There was a purchase of 6 bottles. According to TMZ 20mL and 100mL bottles were found at MJ’s house. Its been noted that 25mg would not knock him out…his weight would require 150mg. If that was done repeatedly it would require more over time!!!
That means there was not enough in order to have given it to him every night for 6 weeks in a quantity that would render him to sleep!
Why is there monitoring equipment in this episode. Its been noted many times there was NO monitor!!!


Saturday, May 19, 2012

Rising Cause of Teen Depression



The short lived high teenagers get from using amphetamines or the club drug MDMA, better known as Ecstasy, could lead to longer lasting issues of depression later on in life. Researchers have interviewed 3,800 teens from low income districts in Quebec. Compared to their peers who used neither drug, teens who reported taking MDMA or amphetamines at least once in their high school years had an increase of depression symptoms by 60 to 70%. Using both drugs nearly doubled the odds of depression.

The findings don’t show a cause and effect relationship between the drug use and later depression, but they do come close. Unlike previous research the study was controlled. Taking into account a large vast of other problems that could influence depression, such as problems at home, school, prior history of depression, anxiety, social networks, smoking and alcohol use. The study is just that, a study, but interestingly enough they did find a connection between the drug use and depression.

The use of MDMA and amphetamines, including Meth, is becoming increasingly common among youth of today. Most important is why do teens and young adults turn to using these substances? Its been shown that children that have ADHD are more prone to using these drugs. Possibly due to the brain chemical imbalance that they deal with on a daily basis. These children are becoming high school drop outs and are in for a hard life ahead if the cycle continues.

Not only can this drug cause social problems, this drug can cause death. Between 1999 to 2004 there were 250 deaths reported, due to exstasy, these are only US statisics. But honestly think of all the deaths that were not reported, there are probably thousands of deaths worldwide that this particular drug in combination with other drugs or alcohol. There are real dangers to using this drug, its not just a party drug. It has long term effects on people, especially our children.

It is our job as a united group to help fight for these children and to help expose them to the dangers of these drugs. The lasting effects on this generation of children are going to be a bunch of depressed individuals that have no sense of awakening or stability. If we don’t stop it now, our world is in for disaster. These are our leaders of tomorrow!!

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Dangers of Energy Drinks


They come under many different brands, Monster, Red Bull,  energy drinks are a huge market currently. But are there real dangers to these caffeine loaded beverages? The answer is YES. In March of this year, a 14 year old child died after drinking two 24 ounce cans. She went into cardiac arrest and died 6 days after laying in a coma in the hospital.


The drinks contain 500 milligrams of caffeine, which is by standards five times what a person should ingest. Those two cans equal up to about 14 cans of Coke. When children ingest these beverages they don’t realize just how dangerous they can be. As there are no warning labels on these products. These products are being marketed toward children, who are oblivious to the potential dangers.


Any substance, including caffeine can have harmful effects, especially on a child. Caffeine overdoes are becoming much too common. The leading culprits are these products. There need to be warning labels on such products, and education for parents. Caffeine is still a drug, we need to understand this!

Sunday, April 29, 2012

The Dangers of Huffing


Recently, there have been serveral deaths of young teens after inhaing the chemical diflouroethane from a popular computer cleaning spray, known as Dust-Off. Falcon the manufacturere of the product, labels cans with conspicuous warnings about misuse of the product. It product Dust-Off itself is not the source of the problem, its only one example of hundreds of common household products with the potentioal to be abused by inhalant abusers.

Inhalant abuse, known as huffing, is the intentional inhalation of chemical vapors to attain a mental "high", or euphoric effect. A wide variety of substances, including many common household products are abused by huffers. The primary population of abusers are children between 12 to 17. Inhalants produce an effect that may be similar to alcohol intoxication.

Symptoms can include: drowsiness, lightheadedness. loss of inhibition, dizziness,, hallucinations or delusions and impaired judgment. Long term effects can include: depression, inattentiveness. lack of coordination, irritability and weakness, and finally brain damage or death.

There are over 500 deaths per year from huffing products, in the United States alone. These products are easily purchased by anyone at a local store. Thus making them a serious potential death trap for our children. Why is the government allowing these products to be sold with the already clarified dangers of them? Shouldn't they be developing an alternative to these products?

Our children only get once chance at life. Lets make their lives count!