A lot of people are trying to frame the gay rights debate around whether or not you have a choice, including me at times, but that does not matter. We should not use whether you have a choice to be the way you are as a reason not to discriminate, we simply should not discriminate.
That does not mean we necessarily have to like everyone for who they are. You can still say you do not like Christians, but they should still have the same rights you. You should not deny them housing, or physically attack them.

I think part of the problem is that we like things to be in black and white and if you take the theory of not discriminating against anyone and apply it against a lot of what ifs it falls apart. This is especially true when you take it and apply this question against criminals. Therefore people try to follow a two phased question. First do you find that person to be moral? Secondly if that person is not moral does that person choose to be that way?
I think that is where the big conundrum is. What is the threshold at which you should deny someone equal treatment? The only way to stop the discrimination is to raise a certain group of people above this threshold that people have set, and that threshold will vary for everybody.
http://youtu.be/Fh1fA46TsRU
No comments:
Post a Comment